Activity

238; P = 0.025), while a higher pERG N95 was associated with a smaller macular island (β = - 499 per µV; R2 = 0.219; P = 0.030). Mean CMT was 271 ± 35 μm and was significantly associated with better vision (β = - 0.083 per 10 µm; R2 = 0.612; P  less then  0.001). CME was diagnosed in 47.2% (n = 17) eyes. There was no significant difference in mean BCVA for those with CME (0.19 ± 0.2 LogMAR) and without CME (0.40 ± 0.5; R2 = 0.081; P = 0.17). All patients had abnormal UW-FAF. Four main patterns of change were identified (granular 55%, annular 11%, bone spicule 17% and patchy 17%). Patients with the patchy pattern demonstrated worse BCVA in comparison with those with granular (P  less then  0.0001) and bone spicule (P = 0.0179) patterns. CONCLUSIONS Structural changes identified on OCT and UW-FAF correlated with BCVA and pERG in this cohort representing different stages of the disease. These parameters could represent reliable biomarkers in therapeutic clinical trials on USH.Successful validation of a head injury model is critical to ensure its biofidelity. However, there is an ongoing debate on what experimental data are suitable for model validation. Here, we report that CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) scores based on the commonly adopted relative brain-skull displacements or recent marker-based strains from cadaveric head impacts may not be effective in discriminating model-simulated whole-brain strains across a wide range of blunt conditions. We used three versions of the Worcester Head Injury Model (WHIM; isotropic and anisotropic WHIM V1.0, and anisotropic WHIM V1.5) to simulate 19 experiments, including eight high-rate cadaveric impacts, seven mid-rate cadaveric pure rotations simulating impacts in contact sports, and four in vivo head rotation/extension tests. All WHIMs achieved similar average CORA scores based on cadaveric displacement (~ 0.70; 0.47-0.88) and strain (V1.0 0.86; 0.73-0.97 vs. V1.5 0.78; 0.62-0.96), using the recommended settings. However, WHIM V1.5 produced ~ 1.17-2.69 times strain of the two V1.0 variants with substantial differences in strain distribution as well (Pearson correlation of ~ 0.57-0.92) when comparing their whole-brain strains across the range of blunt conditions. Importantly, their strain magnitude differences were similar to that in cadaveric marker-based strain (~ 1.32-3.79 times). This suggests that cadaveric strains are capable of discriminating head injury models for their simulated whole-brain strains (e.g., by using CORA magnitude sub-rating alone or peak strain magnitude ratio), although the aggregated CORA may not. This study may provide fresh insight into head injury model validation and the harmonization of simulation results from diverse head injury models. It may also facilitate future experimental designs to improve model validation.Elastin is a key structural protein and its pathological degradation deterministic in aortic aneurysm (AA) outcomes. Unfortunately, using current diagnostic and clinical surveillance techniques the integrity of the elastic fiber network can only be assessed invasively. click here To address this, we employed fragmented elastin-targeting gold nanoparticles (EL-AuNPs) as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of unruptured AAs. Electron dense EL-AuNPs were visualized within AAs using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and the corresponding Gold-to-Tissue volume ratios quantified. The Gold-to-Tissue volume ratios correlated strongly with the concentration (0, 0.5, or 10 U/mL) of infused porcine pancreatic elastase and therefore the degree of elastin damage. Hyperspectral mapping confirmed the spatial targeting of the EL-AuNPs to the sites of damaged elastin. Nonparametric Spearman’s rank correlation indicated that the micro-CT-based Gold-to-Tissue volume ratios had a strong correlation with loaded (ρ = 0.867, p-val = 0.015) and unloaded (ρ = 0.830, p-val = 0.005) vessel diameter, percent dilation (ρ = 0.976, p-val = 0.015), circumferential stress (ρ = 0.673, p-val = 0.007), loaded (ρ = - 0.673, p-val = 0.017) and unloaded (ρ = - 0.697, p-val = 0.031) wall thicknesses, circumferential stretch (ρ = - 0.7234, p-val = 0.018), and lumen area compliance (ρ = - 0.831, p-val = 0.003). Likewise, in terms of axial force and axial stress vs. stretch, the post-elastase vessels were stiffer. Collectively, these findings suggest that, when combined with CT imaging, EL-AuNPs can be used as a powerful tool in the non-destructive estimation of mechanical and geometric features of AAs.Despite large strides in molecular oncology, surgery remains the bedrock in the management of visceral cancer. The primacy of surgery cannot be understated and a mesenteric (i.e. ontogenetic) approach is particularly beneficial to patients. Heald greatly advanced the management of rectal cancer with his description of the anatomical foundation of total mesorectal excision (TME), dramatically improving outcomes worldwide with this mesenteric-based approach. Moreover, complete mesocolic excision (CME) based on similar principles is becoming popular. Introduced by Hohenberger, CME resembles TME insofar as it emphasises strictly anatomical dissection along embryological planes to detach an intact (i.e. “complete”) mesentery with peritoneal envelope. CME also incorporates “central” vascular ligation (CVL) which broadly correlates with the “D3 lymphadenectomy” of Eastern literature. As many surgeons already practise anatomical and mesenteric-based surgery, it is unclear how the putative benefits of CME (including CVL) arise. Herein, we argue that these may relate to a more extensive resection of the mesentery, and thus mesenteric tumour deposits within the connective tissue lattice of the mesentery, and not necessarily the lymphadenectomy alone. We believe the connective tissue interface between the bowel wall and mesentery provides an alternative mode of spread of pathogenic elements. Whilst this remains a suggestion only, it would explain the histological independence of tumour deposits and why a greater mesenterectomy could be associated with benefits in survival. If this argument holds, it follows that resectional surgery for digestive organ malignancy is not surgery of the organ itself (or lymphatics only), but also that of the contiguous mesentery.